Funcionária de aeroporto chama feio a passageiro ✈️
em
Obter link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Outras aplicações
Um passageiro do aeroporto internacional de Greater Rochester decidiu tornar público uma situação desconfortável que aconteceu com ele.
Strassner, o passageiro, passou pelo detector de metais quando uma funcionária lhe entregou um papel para a mão.
A príncipio, Strassner não ligou muito mas a funcionária lhe perguntou "Não vai ler?""
Quando Strassner, leu o que estava escrito no papel, a funcionária começou a rir dele. No papel estava escrito "Você é feio!"
Mais tarde, Stassner participou o ocorrido e solicitou uma cópia da gravação das câmaras de segurança através de um pedido de liberdade de informação (algo possível nos EUA).
Na gravação é possível ver ainda que depois dela entregar a nota a Strassner, pela pega na caixa das luvas para fazer mais notas ofensivas.
A administração do aeroporto informou que ela não é funcionária directa do aeroporto mas sim uma contratada de um empresa terceirizada e ainda acrescentou que há tolerância zero para este tipo de comportamento.
This incident highlights the importance of accountability and professionalism in public-facing roles. The security footage appears to support the complaint by showing the contractor allegedly preparing additional offensive notes after the initial interaction, which raises serious concerns about workplace conduct. The airport administration's statement emphasizing zero tolerance for such behavior is significant, as it reinforces expectations of respect and inclusivity regardless of whether the individual is a direct employee or a third-party contractor. The case also demonstrates how access to public records can help provide transparency and clarify disputed events.
The availability of security footage played a crucial role in bringing clarity to the situation. By requesting the recording through a Freedom of Information Act process, Stassner was able to obtain evidence that appeared to support her account of the incident. The footage reportedly showing additional offensive notes being prepared after the initial interaction raises serious concerns about intentional misconduct rather than a misunderstanding. Cases like this highlight the importance of transparency, accountability, and proper oversight in public-facing environments where respectful treatment of individuals should always be a priority.
This incident highlights the importance of accountability and professionalism in public-facing roles. The security footage appears to support the complaint by showing the contractor allegedly preparing additional offensive notes after the initial interaction, which raises serious concerns about workplace conduct. The airport administration's statement emphasizing zero tolerance for such behavior is significant, as it reinforces expectations of respect and inclusivity regardless of whether the individual is a direct employee or a third-party contractor. The case also demonstrates how access to public records can help provide transparency and clarify disputed events.
ResponderEliminarThe availability of security footage played a crucial role in bringing clarity to the situation. By requesting the recording through a Freedom of Information Act process, Stassner was able to obtain evidence that appeared to support her account of the incident. The footage reportedly showing additional offensive notes being prepared after the initial interaction raises serious concerns about intentional misconduct rather than a misunderstanding. Cases like this highlight the importance of transparency, accountability, and proper oversight in public-facing environments where respectful treatment of individuals should always be a priority.
ResponderEliminar